Data-driven agriculture and Smallholder Farmer :
The entire buzz about data-driven agriculture at times brings our attention back to the smallholder farmer, whose communities have been engaged in agriculture over generations, and who produce the majority of the world’s food. Where does he fit in the new scheme of things, in which data generation and use are only increasing? It’s possible that the smallholder farmer will find his place, but its as much about making it happen.
Smallholder farmers have always been vital to the world’s economy. They are the marginal and sub-marginal farm households who own and cultivate on less than two hectares of land. There are about 500 million such smallholder farmers worldwide, and more than 2 billion people depend on them for livelihoods. It’s these farmers who produce 80% of the food consumed in Asia and sub-Saharan Africa.
In the past decades, a lot of research has gone into the study of agrarian systems, and these have revealed two important, consistent findings. The first is that all farmers need to be treated as entrepreneurs, no matter what scale they work on. The second is that there needs to be efficient and systematic linkage from farm to market in order for the farmer to be in a comfortable and profitable situation. Both of these – the idea of being entrepreneurial and the idea of creating linkages, can greatly benefit from data-driven farming, and it is interesting to see how they are coming together.
The concept and practice of data-driven agriculture emerged from the need to participate in globally competitive and market-oriented systems of agriculture.
Data-driven agriculture is the system of using big data to supplement on-farm precision agriculture – using the right farm data, at the right time and in the right formats to make better decisions.
It is already being practised in a big way in developed countries and market-oriented agri-food chains. And it’s making its way into developing countries. There are different types of data that is captured and generated under this system. The first is localised data that is generated and compiled on the farm, to be used on the farm itself. The second type is ‘imported’ data which is generated and collated off the farm. These are used off the farm. The third type is ‘exported’ data generated and collated on the farm, but to be used off the farm. The fourth type is called ‘ancillary’ data, which is generated and collated (on and off) the farm, mainly for use off the farm.
While it is difficult to reach farmers at an individual level, the best way to help farmers use data is through an aggregation of farmers, through a cooperative, or through a nodal agency. There’s a lot that smallholder farmers can gain from data – even small improvements in their operations can increase yields and profitability. Especially in countries where the entire agricultural systems are dependent on such smallholders, their adoption of this technology can actually transform agri-food systems. Enabling their adoption by smallholders include also developing appropriate policies and related institutions and structures, providing incentives to farmers, support systems, and the necessary infrastructure and connectivity. Also, groups who represent smallholders and producers more generally – associations, federations, co-operatives, and social enterprises must take up these issues and build their own, and their members’ capacities to be equipped to manage these systems.
There is no doubt that data-driven agriculture offers a lot of opportunities for the agriculture sector, but it is not a panacea. Like all technologies, it can tend to further marginalize an already marginalized group. This especially holds true for developing countries. The thing to ensure is that such farmer groups must first gain access to relevant data, and the second, ensure that any data generated on their farm and shared is not used to weaken their positions in any way.
Data is used for various purposes in agri-food systems. For farmers, it can be used to make decisions of what to produce, where to produce and when to produce on the farm. Making such decisions requires the support of localized data from the farm, such as soil, and imported data from outside the farm, such as weather data, market data. The second use of data for farmers is monitoring and assessing how the crop is growing, and whether the required resources are available. Gathering this kind of data requires a higher-level use of technology like sensors. For example, soil data from sensors, when combined with weather data, can help with decisions on what actions to take.
Most of the world’s farms are small, and this also applies to rich countries. What differentiates them is the average labour productivity. The richest ten percent of the countries are fifty times more productive than the poorest ten percent of the countries.
So, one of the most promising areas in which to apply data-driven agriculture is in increasing productivity in developing countries. Access to the internet and cell phone helps take advantage of these technologies, and fortunately, the access to these are improving.
SourceTrace's software solutions have been deployed across 32 countries and 4 continents already. We are on a mission to make agriculture and food systems more sustainable. Get in touch and we will extend our expertise and commitment to you.
Today, at SourceTrace we’re happy to share our moment of pride and fulfillment, having made it as the cover story in the Food and Beverage Tech Review.
Download our new whitepaper
'Traceability in 2020: Global Scenario with a focus on India'